Skip to content

Comparison with Other Editors

This page compares Markput with other popular rich text editor libraries to help you understand when Markput is the right choice for your project.

Feature Markput Draft.js Slate ProseMirror
Markup-based
Custom patterns Limited Limited Limited
Bundle size ~15KB ~100KB ~150KB ~200KB
Learning curve Easy Steep Steep Very steep
TypeScript ✅ First-class ⚠️ Limited

Best for:

  • Lightweight editors with custom markup (mentions, tags, commands)
  • Applications that need @mentions, #hashtags, or /commands
  • Projects where bundle size matters
  • Teams that value simple, straightforward APIs
  • Applications requiring pattern-based text formatting

Not for:

  • Complex WYSIWYG editors with rich formatting toolbars
  • Document editors with extensive formatting options (bold, italic, lists, etc.)
  • Applications that need complex nested document structures
  • Full-featured word processor replacements

Strengths:

  • Markup-based approach makes it easy to work with patterns like @mentions and #hashtags
  • Very small bundle size (~15KB)
  • Simple API with minimal learning curve
  • First-class TypeScript support
  • Pattern matching with regular expressions

Limitations:

  • Not designed for complex WYSIWYG editing
  • Limited to markup-based patterns
  • Fewer formatting options compared to full-featured editors

Use cases:

  • Social media comment systems
  • Chat applications with mentions
  • Command palettes with slash commands
  • Tagging systems with hashtags

Strengths:

  • Developed and maintained by Meta (Facebook)
  • Mature ecosystem with many plugins
  • Good for complex rich text editing
  • Handles contentEditable quirks well

Limitations:

  • Large bundle size (~100KB)
  • Steep learning curve
  • Complex API with many concepts to learn
  • Limited TypeScript support
  • Development has slowed down

Use cases:

  • Rich text editors with formatting toolbars
  • Content management systems
  • Note-taking applications

Strengths:

  • Highly customizable and extensible
  • Active development and community
  • Plugin architecture
  • Good TypeScript support

Limitations:

  • Large bundle size (~150KB)
  • Steep learning curve
  • Breaking changes between versions
  • Requires significant setup

Use cases:

  • Custom rich text editors
  • Document editors
  • Collaborative editing tools

Strengths:

  • Most powerful and flexible
  • Excellent for collaborative editing
  • Strong document model
  • Used by many major applications

Limitations:

  • Largest bundle size (~200KB)
  • Very steep learning curve
  • Complex architecture
  • Limited TypeScript support

Use cases:

  • Professional document editors
  • Collaborative editing platforms
  • Complex content management systems

If you’re considering migrating from another editor to Markput, here’s what you need to know:

  1. Convert Draft.js content state to plain text with markup
  2. Configure Markput options to match your entity types
  3. Replace Draft.js components with Markput

Example:

// Draft.js entity
{ type: 'mention', data: { id: '123', name: 'Alice' } }
// Becomes Markput markup
'@[Alice](123)'
  1. Serialize Slate nodes to markup text
  2. Create corresponding markup patterns
  3. Migrate editor component

ProseMirror’s document model is very different from Markput’s markup-based approach. Migration is best suited for applications that can simplify their editing needs to pattern-based markup.

  • React: ✅ Full support (@markput/react)
  • Vue: ✅ Full support (@markput/vue)
  • Svelte/Angular: ⚠️ Core library only (@markput/core)
  • Draft.js: React only
  • Slate: React only
  • ProseMirror: Framework-agnostic

Choose Markput if you need:

  • Pattern-based text input (@mentions, #hashtags, /commands)
  • Small bundle size
  • Simple API
  • Quick implementation

Choose other editors if you need:

  • Complex WYSIWYG editing
  • Rich formatting toolbars
  • Document-style editing
  • Collaborative editing features

Still unsure? Ask in GitHub Discussions!